检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:席书旗[1]
机构地区:[1]山东师范大学社会科学教育学院,山东济南250014
出 处:《山东师范大学学报(人文社会科学版)》2010年第2期145-149,共5页Journal of Shandong Normal University(Humanities and Social Sciences)
基 金:山东省社科规划基金项目"传统法文化与与当代中国法治的文化认同建设"(08DFXJ03)阶段性成果
摘 要:法律权威以法律认同为逻辑推演的起点,而法律认同又以法律具有权威为必要条件。法律权威与法律认同的良性互动以法在社会生活中能够产生预期的法律实效为前提。法律在社会纠纷解决机制中缺乏实践权威导致公众对法律缺乏认同感,法律规范难以转化为民众公认的生活方式;公众对法律缺乏认同感、法治观念淡漠进而又削弱了法律权威。中国法治建设的当务之急乃是强化法律实践权威,提升公众法律认同感,使两者良性共契,及时摆脱目前互相弱化的恶性循环态势。Benign interaction between legal authority and legal identity is based on the premise of legal effectiveness.However,the contents of the authority differ from the practice of the authority in many ways.Because of the insufficiency of legal practice authority in social dispute-resolving mechanism,the public are short of legal identity and rules of law are difficult to be translated into the putative public practical life style.Legal authority is weakened due to the public being short of legal identity and indifferent to idea of rule by law.Enhancing practice authority is the key to government by law construction of China.It is important to bring legal authority and legal identity into positive harmony and break away from the present vicious circle.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3