检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:卓海斌
机构地区:[1]张家界市慈利县人民医院,湖南张家界427200
出 处:《腹腔镜外科杂志》2010年第4期262-264,共3页Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery
摘 要:目的:对比研究腔镜甲状腺手术和开放手术两种术式,探讨经胸骨前路径腔镜甲状腺手术的难度、安全性及美容效果。方法:回顾分析55例腔镜甲状腺切除术(腔镜组)和51例开放甲状腺切除术(开放组)患者的临床资料,比较两组手术时间、出血量、术后疼痛、术后并发症、住院时间、美容效果及患者主观满意度。结果:两组患者的一般资料、住院时间、手术时间及术后并发症差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),出血量、引流量、术后美容效果及患者主观满意度差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:腔镜甲状腺手术安全、有效、可行,具有术中出血少、损伤小、美容效果好等优点,尤其适于有美容要求的年轻患者。Objective:To compare the endoscopic thyroidectomy and open thyroidectomy,investigate the difficulty,security and cosmetic effect of endoscopic thyroidectomy via presternal approach.Methods:Fifty-five cases underwent endoscopic thyroidectomy (endoscopic group),51 cases underwent open thyroidectomy (open group),their clinical data,including operative time,blood loss,postoperative pain,complications,hospital stay,cosmetic result and self-satisfaction,were retrospectively analyzed.Results:There were no significant difference between the two groups in general information,hospital stay,operative time and postoperative complications(P0.05).However,there were considerable differences of blood loss,drainage,cosmetic result and self-satisfaction(P0.05).Conclusions:Endoscopic thyroidectomy is safe,effective,feasible,with less blood loss,mini-trauma and excellent cosmetic result,and it is appropriate for young patient who has cosmetic demand.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.40