检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘军梅[1]
出 处:《东北亚论坛》2010年第3期58-67,共10页Northeast Asia Forum
基 金:教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地2007年度重大研究项目"转型经济国家银行业改革与发展的比较研究"(07JJD790128)
摘 要:1998年和2008年的两次金融危机俄罗斯都没能幸免。两次危机中,虽然诱因不同,但俄罗斯均表现出了股市下挫、银行遭遇流动性危机、卢布贬值等特征。就危机前的宏观经济背景而言,两次危机期间都发生了国际原油价格的大幅下挫,但石油价格下降的原因、幅度及其对俄罗斯造成的影响却有所不同;两次危机都使俄罗斯受负债拖累,但1998年以主权债务为主,而2008年以企业债为主。从根本上来讲,两次危机都暴露出了俄罗斯"依靠油气收益和外国低息贷款来发展经济"的致命弱点,并且显示出近十年的经济转型与发展尚未从根本上改变其经济结构和发展模式。通过两次危机的对比,也再次证明市场经验不足的转型与发展中国家一定要慎重对待金融的开放与自由化。Russia didnt survive from the two financial crisis in 1998 and 2008. Though the reasons are different, the manifestation in Russia is the same : sharp drop in stock market, lack of liquidity of banks, devaluation of Ruble and so on As for the pre - crisis macroeconomic background, we can see that before the two crises, there was a sharp drop in oil prices. But the causes and extent and its impacts on Russia was different. During the two crises, Russia was both carrying big debts. In 1998, it was sovereign debt, while in 2008, it was corporation debt. Fundamentally speaking, we can say that the two crisis revealed the weakness of Russia: first, economic development relies on oil and gas revenues and foreign loans at low interest rates; second, Russia's economic structure and growth pattern hasn't been changed even after almost 10 years of economic transformation and development. By comparing the two crises, we can conclude that developping and transiton countries with less expirences should be much careful with financial openness and liberalization.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7