检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:吴云刚[1,2] 倪剑武 吴春雷[2] 吴剑静[2]
机构地区:[1]浙江中医药大学,浙江杭州310053 [2]温州医学院附属第一医院,浙江温州325000 [3]浙江省温州市第八人民医院,浙江温州325000
出 处:《中医正骨》2010年第4期21-23,共3页The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology
摘 要:目的:观察腰椎间孔加坐骨神经分支阻滞治疗腰椎间盘突出症的临床疗效。方法:将78例患者随机分为治疗组和对照组,对照组给予单纯腰椎间孔阻滞,治疗组给予腰椎间孔阻滞加坐骨神经分支阻滞治疗,应用广义估计方程(generalized estim atingequation,GEE)进行统计比较。结果:两组比较,差异有统计学意义,治疗组优于对照组;而两组不同随访时间点之间比较,差异无统计学意义,说明随着时间的推移,疗效无明显变化。结论:腰椎间孔加坐骨神经分支阻滞较单纯腰椎间孔阻滞治疗腰椎间盘突出症疗效明显。Objective:To explore the clinical effect of lumber intervertebral disk herniation treated with intervertebral foramen nerves and sciatic nerve branches block.Methods:78 cases of Lumber Intervertebral Disk Herniation were randomly divided into two groups,which are control group(intervertebral foramen nerves block) and treatment group(intervertebral foramen nerves and sciatic nerve branches block),and the results were contrasted by GEE.Results:The results showed that there were significant differences between two groups,and it indicated that the effective rates in treatment group was obviously better than that in control one.There was no significant difference at different time points,and it showed that the effect was no significant change with the passage of time.Conclusion:Intervertebral foramen nerves and sciatic nerve branches block for the treatment of lumber intervertebral disk herniation is obviously effective than the nerve block only.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222