检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王柏敏[1] 余敏斌[2] 李劲嵘[2] 林羡钗[2] 向晖[1]
机构地区:[1]武警广东省总队医院眼科,广州510507 [2]中山大学中山眼科中心眼科学国家重点实验室,广州510060
出 处:《中国实用眼科杂志》2010年第4期351-355,共5页Chinese Journal of Practical Ophthalmology
摘 要:目的研究使用计算机终端及不同的休息方案对调节、聚散功能的影响。方法30名受试者均接受5种不同阅读方案:(1)连续计算机终端阅读2h后休息10min。(2)连续书本阅读2h后休息10min。(3)连续计算机终端阅读1h后休息10min(休息1方案)。(4)计算机终端阅读总时间1h,每30min间隔休息5min(休息2方案)。(5)计算机终端阅读总时间1h,每15min间隔休息2min(休息3方案)。每次阅读前后分别查眼部屈光、调节反应(调节滞后度)、单眼调节幅度、聚散功能(集合近点、调节性集合/调节[accommodative convergence/accommodation, AC/A]、远近距水平隐斜、远近距融像性水平聚散力)。结果(1)连续2h计算机终端阅读后较书本阅读更易出现调节滞后值增加、调节幅度下降、集合近点远移、近距水平外隐斜增加内隐斜减小、近距融像性水平聚合力减弱(P〈0.05)。(2)连续计算机终端阅读2h较1h更易出现调节滞后值增加、调节幅度下降、集合近点远移(P〈0.05)。(3)调节滞后值、调节幅度、集合近点、近距离水平内外隐斜在三种休息方案之间的差异具有统计学意义(P〈0.05),休息3方案优于其它方案。结论使用计算机终端阅读较书本阅读更易对调节、聚散功能产生影响,且随时间的不同出现差异。三种不同休息方案比较,每使用计算机终端阅读15min间隔休息2min对调节、聚散功能影响最小。Objective To evaluate the effects of work-rest schedules on accommodation, vergence for computer terminal reader.Methods Thirty participants underwent 5 reading assignments : ( 1 ) 2-hour continuous computer-based reading, followed by 10 minutes rest; (2) 2-hour continuous book-based reading, followed by 10 minutes rest; (3) 1 hour continuous computer-based reading followed by 10 minutes rest (work-rest schedule 1, WS1 ); (4) 1-hour computer-based reading with a 5-min break in every 30 mins ( WS2 ) ; ( 5 ) 1-hour computer-based reading with a 2-min break in every 15 mins ( WS3 ).On the same day before and after assignment, non-Cycloplegic refraction, lag of accommodation (LA), accommodation amplitude (AA), and vergenee (including near point of convergence [NPC], horizontal phoria [HP] at near [HP-N] and far [HP-F] distance, and horizontal fusional vergence [HFV] at near and far distance, accommodative convergence/ accommodation [AC/A]) were measured.Results People with reading assignment 1 were more likely to have increased LA, NPC, horizontal exophoria at near distance (HP-N exo), and decreased AA, horizontal esophoria at near distance (HP-N eso), horizonta fusional convergence at near distance (HFC-N) than did people with reading assignment 2 (P〈0.05).These changes but HP and HFC-N were more profound in people with assignment 1 than in people with assignment 3 (WS1) (all with P〈0.05 ).These changes but HFCN were seen in people with WS1/WS2 than in people with WS3 (all with P〈0.05).Conelnsions Computer-based reading is more likely to affect accommodation and vergence than book-based reading.The impacts increase with longer reading time.Compared with WS1 and WS2, WS3 is the optimal reading schedule with least impact on accommodation and vergence.
分 类 号:R144.1[医药卫生—公共卫生与预防医学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28