检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:许奕如[1] 唐玉花[1] 王佐祥[1] 谢蝶兰[1]
出 处:《中国实用护理杂志》2010年第5期50-51,共2页Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing
摘 要:目的对比非接触式眼压计与压陷式眼压计所测量的眼压值,以评价非接触式眼压计的临床应用价值。方法将在门诊做眼压筛查的160例患者320只眼纳入本观察,采用自身前后对照法,对比非接触式眼压计(简称NCT)与压陷式眼压计测量的眼压值。结果用NCT测量的眼压值显著低于压陷式眼压计的测量值。结论NCT测量的眼压值显著低于压陷式眼压计测量的眼压值,对于NCT眼压在2.67kPa者,最好用压陷式眼压计再测1次或间隔复诊。Objective To compare the measured IOP values by non-contact tonometerand indentation tonometer in order to evaluate the non-contact tonometer in clinical application. Methods 320 eyes of 160 patients for screening of lOP in the clinic were included in the observation, by self-control study, the IOP value of the non-contact tonometer (abbreviated NCT) and the indentation tonometer was compared. Results IOP values measured by NCT was lower than that measured by indentation tonometer. Conclusions IOP values measured by NCT was lower than that measured by indentation tonometer, for IOP value around 2.67 kPa measured by NCT, it is best to use indentation tonometer to retest or coming again for subsequent visit.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.195