检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]西北师范大学地理与环境科学学院,甘肃兰州730070
出 处:《农业系统科学与综合研究》2010年第2期134-139,共6页System Sciemces and Comprehensive Studies In Agriculture
基 金:国家社会科学基金重点项目(08AMZ003);甘肃省自然科学基金项目(0710RJZA104)
摘 要:利用天水市1996-2007年土地利用变化调查数据,采用熵权TOPSIS方法对天水市土地利用结构的合理性进行了综合评价。结果表明:①1996-2007年期间天水市土地利用结构合理度总体上较高,均在90%以上,在时间上的变化呈波动趋势,并且可以明显地分为3个变化阶段。②不同土地利用类型的变化对土地利用结构的合理性影响不同,居民点及工矿用地、牧草地、交通用地与土地利用结构合理度的关联度最高。③控制交通用地和居民点及工矿用地的过快增长,严格保护水域,调整牧草地的比例,对优化天水市土地利用结构具有决定性的作用。④该方法计算简便,思路清晰,结果令人满意,适合于土地利用结构合理度评价。图2,表4,参9。Tbe rationality of land use structure was assessed with coefficient of entropy and TOPSIS method based on changing data of land use from 1996 -2007 in Tianshui City. The results showed:(1)During 1996 -2007 the rationalities of land use structure were totally high and were all beyond 90%, the rationality of land use structure experienced a fluctuated tendency and that could be obviously divided into three phases. (2)The different change of land use types had different effects on the rationality of land use structure;land use types which had a high grey correlation degree with the land use structure rationality were residential and industrial land, traffic land and grassland. (3)It could be decisive to control the excessively rapid growth of construction land and adjust the proportion of grassland in promoting the rationality of land use structure in Tianshui City. (4)The method is simple, and feasible to evaluate the rationality of land use structure.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249