检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:谢旻荻[1]
出 处:《四川师范大学学报(社会科学版)》2010年第3期10-14,共5页Journal of Sichuan Normal University(Social Sciences Edition)
基 金:四川省教育厅人文社会科学研究课题"犯罪经济学视野中的知识产权犯罪"(SB06016)
摘 要:根据犯罪的理性选择理论,遏制某种犯罪一般应从提高犯罪行为的必罚性和加大处罚力度两方面出发。但是,知识产权犯罪的特殊性决定了采取这两条途径不易取得理想的效果。知识产权犯罪具有发现难、取证难和定罪难的特点,犯罪者受罚的概率相对较低,知识产品特殊的效用属性和竞争属性又使加大处罚力度缺乏必要的民意基础,因此知识产权犯罪的防控应从重视财产刑的适用和控制与知识产权有关的垄断行为等方面入手。According to the rational choice theory in crime-committing, crime containment should generally start with enhancing punishment inescapability and punishment severity, which however fail to have desirable effect in containing crime against intellectual property rights due to the special nature of the crime, for its discovery, evidence-obtaining and crime-determining are difficult with low penalizing rate, the special properties of efficiency and competition of intellectu- al products ensue the lack of necessary basis of popular will for the enhancement of punishment severity, and therefore its prevention should start with an emphasis on property-oriented penalty application and monopoly-related intellectual property rights.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229