检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《中国临床心理学杂志》2010年第1期41-43,共3页Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
基 金:教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地2006年度重大项目(06JJD880021)
摘 要:目的:运用主题统觉测验探索边缘型人格障碍(BPD)的客体关系特点。方法:对某师范大学新生施测PDQ-4+问卷,选取边缘型得分7分以上者进行SCID-Ⅱ结构化访谈,共确诊62人,从中按边缘型得分由高到低选取30名被试作为BPD组。从边缘型得分小于2的群体中,由低到高选取30名被试作为非BPD组,比较两组在社会认知和客体关系量表(SCORS)四个维度上的得分。结果:两组被试在客体关系表征复杂性、情感基调和社会归因三个维度上存在显著差异,情感投入与道德发展没有显著差异。情感基调这一变量能够预测边缘型得分。结论:BPD组大学生的客体关系四维度中,表征复杂性、情感基调和社会归因三个维度发展水平明显低于非BPD组大学生。Objective: To explore the object relation in the college students with borderline personality disorder(BPD) by thematic appearance test (TAT). Methods: The result of the social cognitive and object relation scale (SCORS) of BPD students was compared with that of the non-BPD students. Results: The BPD students got significantly lower scores in complexity of representations of people, affect-tone of relationship paradigms, and understanding of social causality. But there was no significant difference in the capacity for emotional investment in relationships and moral standards. Conclusion: The object relation of BPD students is different from that of the non-BPD students. The non-BPD students develop better in complexity of representations of people, affect -tone of relationship paradigms, and understanding of social causality.
关 键 词:边缘型人格障碍 社会认知和客体关系量表 主题统觉测验
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3