检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]首都师范大学心理系,北京100089 [2]武警医学院心理学研究所,天津300162
出 处:《中国临床心理学杂志》2010年第1期50-52,55,共4页Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
摘 要:目的:探讨抑郁大学生是否存在负性的社交依赖自我图式。方法:采用流调中心用抑郁量表(CES-D)、焦虑自评量表(SAS)对某大学500名学生进行测量,筛选出符合要求的被试共77名,其中抑郁组24人,焦虑组12人,抑郁焦虑组17人,正常对照组24人。严格筛选社交依赖人格形容词作为实验刺激,对抑郁组、焦虑组、抑郁焦虑组、正常对照组施测自我参照编码任务。结果:①抑郁组对正性词汇的认可量显著低于正常对照组(P<0.01),对负性词汇的认可量显著高于正常对照组(P<0.001),抑郁组对特质词、状态词的认可正偏向均显著低于正常对照组和焦虑组(P<0.001,P<0.05);②抑郁组对状态词的反应时间偏向显著低于正常对照组和焦虑组(P<0.05)。结论:抑郁大学生具有负性的社交依赖自我图式,但这些内容是状态性的。Objective: To test whether depressive college students had sociotropic self-schemata. Methods: A total of 500 college students were surveyed by CES-D and SAS, and 77 college students were chosen for further experiment: 24 with depressive mood, 12 with anxious mood, 17 with both depressive and anxious mood, and 24 normal ones. Sociotropic adjectives were strictly developed, and the 4 groups (depressive vs. anxious vs. depressive and anxious vs. normal) were given Self-referent Encoding Task. Results: ①The depressive group showed significantly less positive adjectives and more negative adjectives for self-descriptive than the normal group (P〈0.01, P〈0.001), and more self-descriptive positive bias for trait and state adjectives than the normal and anxious groups (P〈0.001, P〈0.05). ②The depressive group showed significantly lower reaction time bias than the normal and anxious groups (P〈0.05). Conclusion: The depressive college students have a negative sociotropic schemata with state content.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222