检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:隋晓凤[1] 迟伟群[1] 姚玉虹[1] 张超民[1] 江跃红[1]
机构地区:[1]哈尔滨医科大学附属第四医院,黑龙江哈尔滨150001
出 处:《黑龙江医学》2010年第4期268-269,共2页Heilongjiang Medical Journal
摘 要:目的比较抗环瓜氨酸肽抗体和类风湿因子在类风湿性关节炎诊断中的价值。方法分别用ELISA法、免疫散射比浊法检测48例RA患者和20例非RA患者及30例正常对照组的抗CCP抗体和RF,分析抗CCP抗体、RF及两者联合检测的敏感度、特异度、阳性预测值和阴性预测值。结果抗CCP抗体的敏感度为66.7%,RF的敏感度为75%,经检验两者无显著性差异。抗CCP抗体的特异度为96%,RF的特异度为84%,两者有显著性差异。两者联合检测可提高敏感度91.7%,特异度下降80%。结论抗CCP抗体对RA的诊断敏感性与RF相当,但特异性较RF明显增高,若两者联合检测有助于提高RA的早期诊断率。Objective Compare the value of anti-CCP and RA in the diagnosis of RA.Methods Respectively detect the levels of anti-CCP and RA for 48 examples of RA and 20 examples of Non-RA,and 30 examples of normal control with ELISA and Immune nephelometry and analysis the sensitivity,specificity,positive predictive value and negatively predictive value.Results The sensitivity of anti-CCP to be 66.7%,The sensitivity of RF to be 75%,They have no significant difference.The specificity of anti-CCP to be 96%,The specificity of RF to be 84%.There was a significant difference between the two groups.Their combination can increase the sensitivity of 91.7%,specificity declined rate was 80%.Conclusion Anti-CCP in the diagnosis of RA and RF considerable sensitivity all,but specificity was significantly higher than the RF.If the combination of the two tests are helpful to improve the early diagnosis of RA.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.175