检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《中国新药杂志》2010年第9期737-739,共3页Chinese Journal of New Drugs
摘 要:贴现率的应然取值是我国药物经济学评价中一直悬而未决的问题。文中从社会贴现率的影响因素及其取值的客观要求、成本效益法的适用范围以及国外药物经济学评价中贴现率取值与其社会贴现率的关系等方面,分析、论述药物经济学评价中贴现率的取值与社会贴现率的关系,进而得出我国药物经济学评价中贴现率的应然取值为我国的社会贴现率8%。Nowadays,how to choose the reasonable theoretical discount rate in pharmacoeconomic evaluation in China is still unanswered.In this article,we described the impact factors of social discount rate,the objective requirements of its valuation,the applicable scope of cost-benefit analysis,and the relationship of discount rates used in pharmacoeconomic evaluation and their social discount rates in foreign counties.Based on these descriptions,we analyzed the relationship of discount rate in pharmacoeconomic evaluation and the social discount rate.Thus,we suggest that the discount rate used in pharmacoeconomic evaluation in China should be equal to its social discount rate 8%.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.133.141.175