傅斯年、史语所与现代中国史学潮流的离合  

Split and Tally of the Institute of History and Philology in Charge of Ssu-nien Fu Between Modern Historical Trend

作　　者：陈峰[1] 

机构地区：[1]山东大学文史哲研究院

出　　处：《清华大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2010年第3期80-99,共20页Journal of Tsinghua University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学研究项目(09YJC770044)

摘　　要：20世纪上半期是西方史学从兰克式传统史学向新史学过渡的前夕,与此同时,中国史学也正面临着一场深刻变革,"新史学"与"新汉学"的消长起伏构成此时的一道重要景观。"新史学"以社会史、民众史为主体,以社会科学为辅助方法,梁启超的"新史学"思潮、唯物史观派史学以及后来的会通史学都是这一范式的代表;植根乾嘉、外接西学的"新汉学"则重客观实证,以史料为中心,以胡适倡导的整理国故运动为主体。"新史学"与年鉴派不谋而合,代表着一种富含生机的新潮流;"新汉学"与兰克史学同调,绝非现代新潮。傅斯年主持的史语所,揭橥科学的大旗,反对发扬国学、汉学,但在学术路向上,它侧重史料搜考,传导实证学风,实质上仍归属"新汉学"的谱系。由于知识背景、门户之见和派系利益诸方面的原因,以致史语所最终与现代史学的新潮流失之交臂。In the early 20th century,the world historiography trend is from Rankean historiography to the new historiography. At the sametime,Chinese historiography was under going a deep tranform. New historyiography laid particular emphasis on social history and civilian history. It depended on the method of social science. New historiography concludes Qichao Liang's new history,materialisthistorical school and comprehensive historiography in the 1930s. New Hanxue underlined objective and positivism. Its center is His-torical Textual Research. New Hanxue attaches its to the Rearranging the National Heritage movement that Shi Hu advocated. Infact,New Hanxue is an old trend though it is in orthodox before 1949. The institute of history and philology(IHP)in charge of FuSsu-nien belong to New Hanxue even if its holding high the banner of science. Limit to knowledge background,school prejudiceand group interest,IHP run counter to modern historical mainstream.

关 键 词：“新史学” “新汉学” 史语所 疏离 西方史学 

分 类 号：K092[历史地理—历史学]