检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:伍昭燕[1]
机构地区:[1]四川省达州职业技术学院,四川达州635001
出 处:《四川畜牧兽医》2010年第5期31-33,共3页Sichuan Animal & Veterinary Sciences
摘 要:本试验针对本地鸡设计了A、B、C、D4种饲料进行饲养试验,结果表明:A组(混合型基础日粮+中草药添加剂)平均日增重比B组(混合型日粮+抗生素添加剂)、C组(玉米型基础日粮+中草药添加剂)、D组(玉米型基础日粮+抗生素添加剂)分别提高20.3%、18.2%、46.8%,与B、C组之间差异显著(P<0.05),与D组之间差异极显著(P<0.01);经济效益以A组最好,比B、C、D组分别提高26.37%、26.05%、59.75%;平均采食量A组比B、C、D组分别提高1.20%、0.87%、9.87%。A、B组比C、D组平均日增重提高19.94%,差异显著(P<0.05),经济效益提高26.04%;A、C组比B、D组平均日增重提高22.04%,差异显著(P<0.05),经济效益提高22.67%。因此,用稻米来代替部分玉米,用中草药添加剂代替抗生素添加剂是可行的,且能获得较好的日增重和经济效益。The experiment designed four kinds of feed named A,B,C and D for local chicken,the result showed that group A's average daily gain (ADG) was higher 20.3%、18.2% and 46.8% than that of group B,C and D. The differences between group A and group B,C was marked (P〈0.05),and significant between group A and group D(P〈0.01). The economic benefits of group A was best,and its higher 26.37%、26.05% and 59.75% than that of group B,C and D. The group A's AFI was higher 1.20%,0.87%,9.87% than that of groupB,C and D. Guoup A and B's ADG was higher 19.94% than that of group C and D,and the economic benefits increased 26.04%. Group A and C's ADG was higher 22.04% than that of group B and D,and the economic benefits increased 22.67%. So we concluded that it was feasible to use rice instead of corn,use Chinese herbal medicine instead of antibiotic to feed chicken,the ADG and economic benefits were also better.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117