论我国定罪思维的传统及其演化  

On the Tradition and Evolvement of Chinese Judicial Thinking of Conviction

作　　者：欧阳本祺[1] 

机构地区：[1]东南大学法学院,江苏南京211189

出　　处：《法律科学（西北政法大学学报）》2010年第3期21-29,共9页Science of Law：Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law

基　　金：司法部"国家法治与法学理论研究项目"<中西刑法文化和定罪制度比较研究>(08SFB2024)

摘　　要：我国传统的定罪思维是道德实用主义:适用法律为推行道德服务,定罪的最终目标是罪刑相适应;这种定罪思维在法律解释与事实认定两个方面都有体现。我国现阶段定罪制度反应了西方规则主义思维与我国传统实用主义思维的冲突,如法律与情理的冲突、判决与刑事和解的冲突、形式解释与实质解释的冲突。我国未来定罪思维的出路在于协调规则主义与实用主义的冲突,使两者在各方面尽量融合,而不是一方排斥另一方。The Chinese traditional judicial thinking of conviction practises the moral pragmatism： the application of law is for the implementation of ethic, and the ultimate goal of conviction is the balance between crime and penalty, which is reflected in the interpretation of the law and the fact identification. The Chinese current system of conviction reflects the conflicts between foreign thinking of rule doctrine and the Chinese thinking of pragmatism. The solution lies in the coordination between the thinking of rule doctrine and that of pragmatism in order to integrate the both.

关 键 词：定罪思维 传统 现状 出路 

分 类 号：DF613[政治法律—刑法学]