中国区域环境效率与环境全要素生产率增长  

Environmental Efficiency and Environmental Total Factor Productivity Growth in China's Regional Economies

作　　者：王兵[1] 吴延瑞[2] 颜鹏飞[3] 

机构地区：[1]暨南大学经济学院经济学系,规制与增长研究中心,510632 [2]澳大利亚西澳大学商学院,6009 [3]武汉大学经济与管理学院,430072

出　　处：《经济研究》2010年第5期95-109,共15页Economic Research Journal

基　　金：教育部人文社科项目“节能减排约束下中国经济绩效研究:基于全要素生产率的视角”(08JC790047)的阶段性成果;国家自然科学基金(70873051)和(70703015);国家社会科学基金(08CJL018)和(07AJL009);国家211工程第三期重点学科建设项目“暨南大学产业经济与区域发展”的资助(Cjyyxm09002)

摘　　要：本文运用SBM方向性距离函数和卢恩伯格生产率指标测度了考虑资源环境因素下中国30个省份1998—2007年的环境效率、环境全要素生产率及其成分,并对影响环境效率和环境全要素生产率增长的因素进行了实证研究。本文主要的结论有:能源的过多使用以及SO2和COD的过度排放是环境无效率的主要来源,环境效率较高的省份均集中在东部地区;环境全要素生产率增长率平均高于市场全要素生产率增长率,中西部地区无论是市场全要素生产率还是环境全要素生产率增长率均低于东部地区,资源环境因素对各省份全要素生产率的排名有显著的影响;人均GRP、FDI、结构因素、政府和企业的环境管理能力、公众的环保意识对环境效率和环境全要素生产率有不同程度的影响。This paper applies SBM directional distance function and Luenberger productivity indicator to measure environmental efficiency, Environmental TFP growth and its components in China over the period 1998 to 2007 while accounting for factors about resource environment. We also empirically examine the causes of efficiency and productivity changes. The major conclusions are as follows ： the overuse of energy and the excess of SO2 and COD emission are the main source of environmental inefficiency, and the provinces in the eastern regions experience higher environmental efficiency. The environmental TFP is higher than market TFP on average. Centre regions and western regions are frail in market TFP growth as well as in environment TFP growth. The inclusion of energy saving and emission reduction did change the ranks TFP of Chinese provinces. GRP per capita, FDI, structure factor, the capacity for environmental management of government and firms, environmental protection awareness of people have a varying degree effect on the environment efficiency and environment TFP growth.

关 键 词：环境效率 环境全要素生产率 方向性距离函数 卢恩伯格生产率指标 

分 类 号：F123[经济管理—世界经济]