检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《中华现代护理杂志》2010年第7期768-769,共2页Chinese Journal of Modern Nursing
摘 要:目的探讨临床护理路径在血液透析患者留置深静脉双腔透析导管护理的应用效果。方法选择80例我院血液透析中心接受颈内静脉留置双腔透析导管行透析治疗患者,随机分为对照组(n=39)和观察组(n=41),对照组接受常规护理,观察组按照临床护理路径进行护理。比较两组患者的置管时间、并发症发生率及对治疗满意度等。结果观察组患者并发症发生率明显低于对照组(P〈0.01);观察组置管时间长,对治疗满意度高,与对照组比较差异均有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。结论应用临床护理路径对血液透析患者留置深静脉双腔透析导管治疗进行护理可提高护理的质效,具有重要的临床推广价值。Objective To explore the efficacy of application of clinical pathway for hemodialysis patients with indwelling dialysis catheter via deep vein. Methods A total of 80 hemodialysis patients with indwelling dialysis catheter via deep vein were divided into observation and control group. All of patients were treated with indwelling dialysis catheter via deep vein. Patients in observation group were managed by clinical pathway, while those in control group were managed by routine mode. Then, the time for indwelling dialysis catheter, the complication and satisfaction rate of patients were compared between the two groups. Results The complication rate in the observation group were significantly lower than those of the control group ( P 〈 0. 01 ). The time for indwelling dialysis catheter, the satisfaction rate of patients were significantly supefiory than those of the control group (P 〈 0. 05 ). Conclusions Clinical pathway can improve clinical efficacy of hemodialysis patients with indwelling dialysis catheter via deep vein, which should be worth widespread.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.231