临床医学杂志论著中统计学方法应用的对比研究  

Comparative study of application of statistical methods in articles of clinical medicine

作　　者：赖娟[1] 李征[2] 何集篇[3] 章梦然[3] 熊国强[1] 

机构地区：[1]中南大学公共卫生学院 [2]中南大学湘雅医院放射科,湖南长沙410008 [3]中南大学

出　　处：《中国耳鼻咽喉颅底外科杂志》2010年第2期124-127,共4页Chinese Journal of Otorhinolaryngology-skull Base Surgery

摘　　要：目的通过对比研究了解两种中华临床医学杂志2005～2006年发表的论著中统计学方法的使用情况、存在的问题以及统计学方法应用的发展趋势。方法用统一的调查表进行现况调查,并用SPSS13.0软件进行数据分析。结果共评阅了643篇论著,统计学方法的使用率为86.5%,正确率为82.7%。t检验和列联表分析为常见的统计学方法。常见的错误有t检验运用不当,线性相关分析无区间估计,多元回归分析无方程式,统计分析方法不明确,未给出精确P值等。结论统计分析方法的使用率和正确率均有明显提高,方法更加多元化,但统计学方法的未用、误用现象仍然存在。Objective To assess the application,problems,and trend of statistical methods in two kinds of Chinese journals of clinical medicine published from 2005 to 2006.Methods A uniform questionnaire was adopted in the study and data was analyzed with SPSS13.0 software.Results 643 original articles were included.Statistical methods were used in 86.5% of the articles with an accurate rate of 82.7%;the t-test and contingency table analysis were most commonly used.Common mistakes were inappropriate use of t-test,non-interval estimation in linear correlation analysis,no formula in multiple regression analysis,ambiguity of statistical analysis methods,no exact P values and so on.Conclusion The utilization and accuracy of statistical analysis have been significantly improved,the methods are more diversified,but inappropriate use and lack of statistical methods still exist.

关 键 词：统计学 临床医学 统计分析 

分 类 号：R195.1[医药卫生—卫生统计学]