机构地区:[1]中国医学科学院北京协和医学院肿瘤医院肿瘤研究所妇瘤科,北京100021
出 处:《中华放射肿瘤学杂志》2010年第3期241-245,共5页Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology
摘 要:目的 探讨Ⅰb期手术治疗宫颈鳞癌患者的无瘤生存时间和预后因素.方法 回顾分析2006年前7年本院行PivermⅢ型颈癌根治术+盆腔淋巴结清扫术的206例Ⅰb期宫颈鳞癌患者资料.其中ⅠB1期103例,ⅠB2期103例;术前放疗79例,术后辅助治疗111例.生存率用Kaplan-Meier法计算并Logrank检验和单因素预后分析,Cox模型进行预后多因素分析.结果 随访率为92.7%,随访满5年者106例.全组5年无瘤生存率和总生存率分别为86.8%和96.3%,ⅠB1、ⅠB2期的分别为94.6%和100%、77.9%和92.2%.单因素分析显示肿瘤大/b(FIGO分期)、脉管瘤栓、穹窿以下阴道受累、宫旁阳性和淋巴结转移数〉2个对Ⅰb期5年无瘤生存率有影响,分别为77.9%:94.6%(χ^2=5.58,P=0.018)、74.6%:89.8%(χ^2=10.44,P=0.001)、50%:87.9%(χ^2=7.01,P=0.008)、63.5%:89.5%(χ^2=17.69,P=0.000)和43.6%:89.4%(χ^2=21.47,P=0.000).多因素分析显示HGO分期、脉管瘤栓、淋巴结转移数〉2个对全组5年无瘤生存率有影响(χ^2=4.73,P=0.030;χ^2=9.81,P=0.002;χ^2=6.30,P=0.012);脉管瘤栓、淋巴结转移数〉2个对ⅠB2期5年无瘤生存率有影响(χ^2=6.38,P=0.012;χ^2=3.92,P=0.048).结论 对宫颈鳞癌,脉管瘤栓是ⅠB1期无瘤生存的重要预测指标.术后放疗能减少ⅠB2期复发,但不提高总生存.ⅠB2期术后必须辅助放疗者,术前放疗只用于提高手术成功率,对无瘤生存无影响.ⅠB1期术后只有深肌层浸润者,宜减少术后补充放疗.Objective To analyze the disease-free survival (DFS) and prognostic factors for stage IB cervical squamous cell carcinoma treated by radical hysterectomy. Methods From January 1999 to December 2005, a total of 206 patients with uterus cervical squamous cell carcinoma were retrospectively analyzed. All the patients were treated by type 3 hysterectomy and pelvic and/or para-aortic lymphadenectomy at Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences. The diseases were stage I B1 and I B2 in 103 patients each. Seventy-nine (76.7%) patients had preoperative radiotherapy and 111 (53. 9% ) had postoperative adjuvant treatment (PosAT). Prognostic factors were analyzed using univariate model and multivariate Cox model. Results The follow-up rate was 92. 7%. 106 patients had following-up time of five years. The overall 5-year survival rate and the disease-free survival rate of stage Is, Is, and IB2 were 96. 3% and 86. 8%, 100% and 94. 6%, 92. 2% and 77.9%, respectively. Univariate predictors of DFS included tumor size ( FIGO stage, 77.9% : 94. 6% ; χ^2 = 5.58, P = 0. 018 ), lympho-vascular space involvement ( LVSI, 74.6% : 89. 8% ; χ^2 = 10.44, P = 0. 001 ), vaginal involvement ( purely fornix involvement was not included disease, 50% : 87.9% ; X2 = 7. 01, P = 0. 008 ) , parametrial involvement ( PI, χ^2 = 17.69 ,P = 0. 000 ), and metastatic lymph nodes ( LNM ) 〉 2 ( χ^2= 21.47, P = 0. 000 ) in stage IB disease, while LVSI ( χ^2 = 6. 35, P = 0. 012), PI (χ^2 = 90. 00,P = 0. 000) and LNM 〉 2 ( χ^2 = 26.27, P = 0. 000) in stage IB1 disease, LVSI ( χ^2= 10. 12, P = 0. 001 ), cervical canal involvement ( χ^2 = 4. 60, P = 0. 032), vaginal involvement ( χ^2 = 5.87, P = 0. 015 ), PI ( χ^2= 4. 78, P = 0. 029 ) and LNM 〉 2 ( χ^2 = 6. 72,P=0. 010) in stage IB2 disease. In multivariate analysis, FIGO stage (χ^2 =4. 73,P =0. 030), LVSI ( χ^2 = 9. 81, P = 0. 002 ), and LNM 〉 2 (χ^2 = 6. 30, P = 0. 012 ) were significantl
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...