检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]厦门大学信息科学与技术学院通信工程系,厦门361005
出 处:《中国新通信》2010年第11期19-23,共5页China New Telecommunications
摘 要:浅海水声信道的快衰落、长延时使水声网络媒介访问控制(MAC)层协议的性能受到了较大的负面影响。为了能更好地将无线传感器网络的MAC协议适用于水声网络,本文着重对Aloha协议和冲突避免多址接入(MACA)协议进行改进分析,借助通信网络仿真工具OPNET,比较两者在吞吐量、时延、能量损耗和分组丢失率4方面的性能结果。仿真结果表明:与Aloha协议相比,MACA协议能更好地提高性能,有利于在水声网络中使用。The fast fading and long time delay in the shallow water acoustic channels bring in a lager negative influence to performances of medium access control(MAC) layer protocol for underwater acoustic networks.In order to better apply MAC protocol used in the wireless sensor network to underwater acoustic networks,this paper focused on the analysis of Aloha protocol and multiple access collision avoidance(MACA) protocol and simulated them respectively through OPNET under the circumstances of wireless networks and underwater acoustic networks.Then performances such as throughput,delay,energy consumption and packet loss ratio were compared.Simulation results shows compared to Aloha protocol,MACA protocol can improve performances preferably and be used effectively in underwater acoustic networks.
关 键 词:水声网络 OPNET ALOHA协议 MACA协议
分 类 号:TN929.3[电子电信—通信与信息系统]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:13.59.141.195