检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:孙志煜[1]
机构地区:[1]西南政法大学国际法学院
出 处:《武汉大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2010年第3期422-427,共6页Wuhan University Journal:Philosophy & Social Science
摘 要:随着中国—东盟《全面经济合作框架协议争端解决机制协议》的签署,CAFTA争端解决机制的条约化之路迈出了可喜的一步。CAFTA争端解决机制现有构架不能简单复制NAFTA,其完善也必须考虑各成员方的贸易依附程度、经济实力、自有的区域争端解决机制及各成员方的政治、文化与历史诸因素。CAFTA争端解决机制应从引进NAFTA投资争端解决机制、促使磋商、调解或调停程序机制化、具体化、完善现有仲裁程序三方面进行改进。Legalization of dispute settlement mechanism of the CAFTA has made much progress since China-ASEAN Framework Agreement on Comprehensive Economic Cooperation in the Dispute Settlement Mechanism of the Agreement was signed in 2002.Copying the dispute settlement mechanism of NAFTA can't solve the practical problems of CAFTA.The factors such as the degree of dependence of the members,economic strength,different dispute settlement mechanism and politics,culture and history of the members should be considered in order to perfect the dispute settlement mechanism of CAFTA,and futher the present dispute settlement mechanism of the CAFTA should be improved by introducing the dispute settlement mechanism of investment of the NAFTA,promoting mechanism of the procedure of negotiation,conciliation and mediation and bettering the existing arbitration procedure.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28