检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《中国现代药物应用》2010年第11期35-36,共2页Chinese Journal of Modern Drug Application
摘 要:目的比较开腹手术与经阴道穿刺治疗盆腔包裹性积液的疗效。方法选择2006年1月至2010年1月于我院就诊的盆腔包裹性积液患者为观察对象,并分为A组和B组。A组行开腹手术治疗,B组行经阴道穿刺治疗。结果 A组总有效率为84.00%,B组为81.48%,两组差异无统计学意义。结论经阴道穿刺治疗盆腔包裹性积液与开腹手术疗效相当,且创伤小、费用低,值得在临床上推广。Objective The aim of this study is to comparing the effect on pelvic encapsulated hydrops between operation of ultrasound-guided puncture tapping via vagina and open abdominal operation. Methods The patients who suffered from pelvic encapsulated hydrops and were treated in our hospital during January 2006 to January 2010 were selected as study objects. All of them were divided into group A and group B. The patients in group A were treated with open abdominal operation, while the patients in group B were treated with uhrasound-guided puncture aspiration of hydrops via vagina. Results As far as the total effective rate was concerned,there was no significant difference between the two groups. Conclusion Operation of ultrasound-guided puncture aspiration of hydrops via vagina is a good treating measure for pelvic encapsulated hydrops patients for its good therapeutic effectiveness, noninvasive, and low cost.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222