检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]山东省立医院,济南250021 [2]山东省疾病预防控制中心免疫预防管理所,济南250014
出 处:《中国卫生经济》2010年第6期31-33,共3页Chinese Health Economics
摘 要:目的:建立新型农村合作医疗补偿方案评价指标体系。方法:应用改进的德尔菲法构建新型农村合作医疗补偿方案评价指标体系,应用模糊综合评判法确定评价指标权重。结果:专家平均年龄41岁,平均从事专业时间17年。2轮咨询的回收率分别为95%和100%,权威程度平均值为0.8791,协调系数有统计学意义(P<0.05),权重系数依次为:基金使用为0.3504,受益水平0.3449,费用负担为0.3047。结论:专家的代表性较强,积极性高,权威性和协调性较好。Objective:To set up the evaluation indicator system of the reimbursement program in New Rural Cooperative Medical System. Methods:Delphi Method was used to construct the evaluation indicator system,and Fuzzy Comprehensive Judgment Method was used to determine the weight of the evaluation indicators. Results:The mean age was 43 years old and the mean working time was 17 year. The back rates of the investigations were 95% and 100% in turn. The mean of authorities was 0.879 1,and the harmonious coefficients had statistical significance (P0.05). The weight coefficients were respectively 0.350 4 (use of fund),0.344 9 (benefit level) ,0.304 7(expense burden). Conclusion:The representativeness of the specialists is adequate. The enthusiasm is high. And the authority and harmony are good.
关 键 词:新型农村合作医疗 补偿方案评价指标体系 德尔菲法 模糊综合评判法
分 类 号:R197.1[医药卫生—卫生事业管理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117