检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]武汉大学测绘学院,武汉市珞喻路129号430079
出 处:《武汉大学学报(信息科学版)》2010年第6期683-686,共4页Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University
基 金:国家自然科学基金资助项目(40874017);国家863计划资助项目(2006AA12Z325);国家创新研究群体科学基金资助项目(40721001)
摘 要:比较和分析了使用IGS5min、IGS30s以及CODE30s、CODE5s4种精密卫星钟差产品对精密单点定位(precise point positioning,PPP)精度及其收敛性的影响。在达到同等精度水平时,使用30s和5s采样率的钟差产品,其收敛时间要明显短于5min的精密钟差产品。Both static and kinematic tests were investigated by using IGS 5 min,IGS 30 s,CODE 30 s and CODE 5 s-interval precise satellite clock product in precise point positioning (PPP) solution.Test results show that the sample rate of IGS satellite clock has little effect on the static PPP solution.Using a higher sampling rate can achieve high precision in a short time but they can all obtain the same precision nearly with the time going.While in the kinematic PPP,the sample rate of satellite clock has a significant impact on the PPP solution.The higher the interval of satellite clock is used,the better accuracy it can achieve.The accuracy of kinematic PPP achieved by using 30 s-interval precise satellite clock is improved by nearly 40%-50% in the plane and 20%-30% in the vertical direction with respect to the solution by using 5 min-interval precise satellite clock.While using 5 s and 30 s-interval satellite clock almost produce the same accuracy of kinematic solution.When achieve the same precision,the time to get convergence by using 30 s and 5 s-interval clocks is shorter than that of using 5 min-interval clock significantly.
关 键 词:精密卫星钟差 采样率 精密单点定位 精度 收敛性
分 类 号:P228.41[天文地球—大地测量学与测量工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145