检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:徐泉[1]
机构地区:[1]西南政法大学,重庆401120
出 处:《现代法学》2010年第3期121-132,共12页Modern Law Science
基 金:教育部人文社科2009年度一般项目"中国建构国际经济新秩序法律保障机制研究"(09XJA820007)阶段性研究成果
摘 要:对三种具体行政协定的合宪性讨论随着美国总统和国会之间就对外贸易政策制定权中主导权的争夺而开始兴起。大多数学者和美国法院都承认行政协定的合宪性。确认美国行政协定的合宪性,有利于理清行政协定和美国对外贸易政策的关系,有利于利用行政协定更好地实施美国对外贸易政策,促进其不断发展。With the development of global economy and the defects in the traditional treaty system, the power of the President of the United States begins to extend. The US executive agreements are not only widely used but also play an important role in its foreign trade policy. A heated debate on the constitutionality of the three specific executive agreements is provoked by the struggle of President and the Congress for the dominance in making foreign trade policy. Most of the scholars and the US courts are for the constitutionality of the executive agreements. Confirming constitutionality of executive agreements, in this author' s opinion, is conducive not only to adjusting the relationship between the US foreign trade policies and executive agreements, bit also to implementing and promoting the US foreign trade policy under the executive agreements.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145