检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨惠珍[1] 孟作龙[1] 安思芹[1] 王晓敏[1] 马淑琴[1] 李福莲[1]
机构地区:[1]兰州大学附属白银医院内分泌科,甘肃白银730900
出 处:《护理学杂志》2010年第11期67-69,共3页
摘 要:目的探讨针对2型糖尿病患者的有效健康教育方法。方法将自愿参加小班式强化教育(下称小班教育)的120例2型糖尿病患者作为观察组,按匹配原则选取同期接受常规健康教育的65例2型糖尿病患者作为对照组。观察组每个班限定患者10~15例,每次90min,其中中场休息或课间运动操30min,每周1次,24次为1个循环周期(6个月),患者可中途参加;培训内容包括糖尿病知识讲座、咨询答疑和自护技能操作训练。小班教育前及教育6个月后评价效果。结果观察组糖尿病知识掌握达标率和自护能力达标率显著高于小班教育前(均P<0.01),FPG、2hPG及HbAlc控制水平显著优于对照组(P<0.05,P<0.01)。结论采取小班式强化教育可显著提高2型糖尿病患者的健康教育效果。Objective To explore an effective method for health education for patients with type 2 diabetes. Methods One hundred and twenty patients with type 2 diabetes who voluntarily participated in small size class-intensified health education (observation group), were given intensified health education. There were 10-15 cases in a class, and one course lasted 90 min, with half time break being 30 min, 1 time per week, 24 times as a cycle, and patients could join in at anytime. The contents of health education contained lecture on diabetic knowledge, consultation and self-care skills training. By the matching principle, 65 patients were served as control group receiving conventional health education. Results Significant differences were found in diabetic knowledge and self-care ability in the observation group before and after 6-month intervention (P〈0.01 for all), the values of 2 hPG and HbAlc in the observation group were significantly better than those in the control group (P〈0.05, P〈0.01). Conclusion The effect of health education can be improved by using small size class-intensified health education in type 2 diabetes.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30