检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:殷红[1]
出 处:《辽宁大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2010年第3期114-120,共7页Journal of Liaoning University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)
基 金:2005年国家社会科学基金项目<中亚五国政治民主化问题研究>(项目编号:05BGJ010);教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目<中东欧独联体国家转型比较研究>(项目编号:2007JJDJGW250)的研究成果
摘 要:20世纪80年代末90年代初原苏东国家相继发生政治剧变,随后开始了民主化和市场化的制度转型。由于面临的初始条件及约束条件不同,同是民主化先行的原苏东国家呈现出"同途殊归"的转型结果,建立了不同的政治经济体制,也显示出不同的转型绩效——民主化和市场化水平以及由此而来的经济繁荣与社会发展。通过对原苏东国家转型进程的总结和反思,试图说明,由于各国国情不同,通向民主化和市场化的道路应是多样性的,民主化先行式转型未必占优。In the late 1980s and the early 1990s,the former Soviet Union and Eastern European countries one after another experienced political upheaval,and then started the systematic transformation of democratization and marketization.Because of the different initial conditions and constraints,the former Soviet Union and Eastern European countries that all spontaneously opted to implement the democratization-first transformation,ended up differently,and set up the various political and economic systems,showing diverse transitive effects in democratization,marketization levels,and the resulting economic prosperity and social development.By summarizing and reflecting on the transformation process of the former Soviet Union and Eastern European countries,this paper argues that with different national circumstances,countries should follow their own roads to democracy and market economy,and that democratization-first transformation is not always the best choice.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117