论我国新破产法中人民法院定位的缺失及完善  

Deficiency and Perfection:on the Position of the People's Court in the Latest Law of Bankruptcy in China

作　　者：邓艳君[1] 

机构地区：[1]湖南商务职业技术学院,湖南长沙410205

出　　处：《吉首大学学报（社会科学版）》2010年第3期59-62,共4页Journal of Jishou University(Social Sciences)

摘　　要：新破产法虽然摆脱了行政之手,却赋予了法院过多的权力,导致法院在与管理人、债权人会议的关系上发生错位。基于破产程序非诉讼法律属性的原理,人民法院不宜在破产程序中居主导地位,而应是中立、独立的裁判者、监督者。我国可考虑建立政府破产管理专门机构、管理人协会来理顺法院与管理人之间的关系;通过明确债权人会议对于管理人的选任权、赋予债权人会议对于管理人报酬以及费用等事项的决定权,来理顺法院与债权人会议之间的关系。The latest law of bankruptcy authorizes too much power to the court instead of administration, which has brought an improper relationship between the court and the administrator and the creditors＇ meeting. Under the principle of the non-litigation of the procedures for bankruptcy, the people＇s court is not a leader but a neutral and independent arbitrator or supervisor during the procedures for bankruptcy. Thus it is advisable that the government appoint a special unit or an administrators association to balance the court and the administrators. It is also practical to clarify the right of decision of creditors＇ meeting in assigning and paying the administrators in order to achieve a kind of harmony between the court and the creditors＇ meeting.

关 键 词：新破产法 法院定位 缺失及完善 

分 类 号：D922.291.92[政治法律—经济法学]