“革了文学的命”——论“革命文学”的艺术缺失  

On the Absence of Art in "Revolutionary Literature"

作　　者：王智慧[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国人民公安大学文学系,北京10038

出　　处：《海南师范大学学报（社会科学版）》2010年第2期1-5,共5页Journal of Hainan Normal University(Social Sciences)

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学研究青年项目"中国左翼文学的发难与演进(1927-1937)"(编号:09YJC751035);广东省哲学社会科学"十一五"规划青年项目"主体体验与中国左翼文学的发生"(编号:08YJ-04)基金资助

摘　　要：20世纪20年代中后期在中国崛起的"革命文学",有着强烈的政治功利性追求,文学的宣传性、煽动性得到了充分肯定与极度张扬,艺术审美性则遭到了空前的集体性忽视。大多数"革命文学"作品因对政治观念的简单图解而沦为粗陋不堪的标语口号;艺术性的缺失更使人觉得"革命文学"实乃"革了文学的命"。Emerging in China in the mid and late 1920s, ＂revolutionary literature＂ was fully affirmed and extremely publicized for its strong political ulititarianism and its literary publicity and instigation while its artistic aesthetics was collectively neglected to an unprecedented extent. As such, great majority of ＂revolutionary literature＂ have degenerated into coarse and crude slogans due to their casual diagrammatic illustration of political notions, whereas its absence of artistry has virtually turned literature upside down.

关 键 词：“革命文学” 政治功利性 宣传 煽动 

分 类 号：I206.6[文学—中国文学]