中英传统社会:私人财产权利合法性来源的差异及成因考  

Traditional Societies of China and Britain:the Differences of the Legitimacy of Private Property Right

作　　者：魏建国[1] 

机构地区：[1]黑龙江大学法学院,黑龙江哈尔滨150080

出　　处：《历史教学（下半月）》2010年第6期21-29,共9页History Teaching

基　　金：司法部法治与法学理论研究项目:民事权利与宪政(项目编号06SFB5010)的阶段性研究成果

摘　　要：中英两国传统社会的私人财产权利合法性来源存在明显差异:中国私人财产权利的合法性来源于国家的授予;英国私人财产权利的合法性来源于社会性认可与生成。中国传统社会私人财产权利合法性来源于国家授予的成因,在于普天之下为皇帝所拥有;英国传统社会私人财产权利合法性来源于社会性生成与认可,而究其形成根源,源于财产权利存在于与王权对立的等级、特权式自由之中,并且英国能将这种等级、特权式的自由与权利普及化为一种民众的基本权利。以私人财产权利合法来源的差异及成因,为分析视角的比较研究,对于认知和厘清中英传统社会的社会形态不同特质具有较强的线索性和启发性。There were obvious differences Britain about the private property the awarding of the country; the in legitimacy sources of the traditional societies of China and right： the legitimacy of China＇s private property right stems from legitimacy of Britain＇s private property right is stemmed from social approval. The legitimacy of Chinese private property rights derived from the awarding of the country, basing on all over the world owned by emperor. The legitimacy of Britain＇s private property right is basing on the grade, freedom and right of privilege opposing to royal power, that Britain can turn into the fundamental right of people. It＇s very important for studying the different specialities of traditional societies between China and Britain by the comparative study of the differences of the legitimacy of private property right.

关 键 词：传统社会 中国 英国 私人财产权利 合法性来源 

分 类 号：D092[政治法律—政治学] D095.61