检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]北京大学医院麻醉科,北京100871 [2]北京世纪坛医院麻醉科
出 处:《中国校医》2010年第6期442-443,共2页Chinese Journal of School Doctor
摘 要:目的观察治疗腰椎间盘突出症2种方法的效果。方法 40例患者随机分为2组,分别选用L3横突加椎旁神经阻滞(A组)法和硬膜外阻滞法(B组)治疗,且行疼痛测定视觉模拟标尺法(VAS)评分,并监测血压变化、腰痛反应和离床行走时间。结果 2组方法治疗VAS评分均下降(P<0.05),2组治疗前后比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),且A组无不良反应。结论 2种方法治疗腰椎间盘突出症均有效,A组更适合门诊应用。Objective To evaluate the curative effectiveness of two different methods on patients with prolapse of lumbar intervertebral disc.Methods A total of 40 patients with prolapse of lumbar intervertebral disc were divided into Group A and Group B randomly and treated with two different methods,L3 transverse block plus paravertebral nerve block was performed in Group A and epidural block in Group B.Simultaneously,VAS scores,blood pressure,low back pain reaction and the time of walking away from the bed were recorded.Results The VAS scores of two groups both declined,P〈0.05.There was no significant difference between two groups before and after the treatment,P〉0.05.Adverse effects were not found in Group A.Conclusions The two methods are valid in the treatment of the patients with prolapse of lumbar intervertebral disc.The method used in Group A is more suitable for outpatients.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.63