检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]安徽医科大学第二附属医院康复医学科,安徽合肥230601 [2]安徽医科大学第一附属医院康复医学科,安徽合肥230022
出 处:《安徽医药》2010年第7期794-796,共3页Anhui Medical and Pharmaceutical Journal
基 金:安徽省卫生厅临床医学应用技术研究项目(No06B117);安徽省高校自然科学研究项目(NoKJ2008A097);高校省级自然科学研究项目立项(NoKJ2010A194)
摘 要:目的探讨应用汉译版恐惧-逃避信念问卷(Fear-avoidance beliefs questionnaire,FABQ)评估腰痛患者的可靠性。方法将英文原版FABQ按一定要求翻译、汉化得到汉译版FABQ(CFABQ),对34例住院行康复治疗的腰痛患者(男21例,女13例;年龄22~60岁,平均42.6岁),用CFABQ进行2次测试,间隔期2 d,检测CFABQ的重复性;对门诊126例腰痛患者在就诊时行CFABQ、汉译版Oswestry功能障碍指数(CODI)、11分疼痛评定量表(11-point pain numerical rating scale,NRS)、36项简化版健康调查问卷(Medical Outcomes 36-Item Shot-Form Health Survey,SF-36)测试,并对结果进行相关分析。结果CFABQ具有良好的重复性(r=0.805(男性),r=0.815(女性),P〈0.01);CFABQ具有良好的有效性,它的2个分量表与NRS相关系数分别为0.210(P〈0.01),0.192(P〈0.05);与CODI的相关系数为0.420(P〈0.01),0.351(P〈0.01);与SF-36(physical)相关系数为-0.268(P〈0.01),-0.173(P〈0.01);与SF-36(mental)相关系数为-0.154(P〉0.05),-0.303(P〈0.01)。结论CFABQ具有良好的可重复性和有效性,可用于对腰痛患者的评估。Aim To translate the fear-avoidance belief questionnaire and explore the reliability of the Chinese version of the fear-avoidance belief questionnaire(CFABQ) for evaluating patients with low back pain.Method To develop the CFABQ,the English FABQ was translated into Chinese.The repeatability of the CFABQ was evaluated in 34 inpatients.These patients were examined two times using the CFABQ in two days.The validity of the CFABQ was evaluated in 160patients,including 34 inpatients and 126 outpatinets who consulted a rehabilitation physician by CFABQ,CODI,NRS and SF-36.The Spearman correlation was calculated between CFABQ and other scales.Result The CFABQ shows good repeatability(r=0.805(male),r=0.815(female),P〈0.01).Spearman's correlation coefficients between two sub-scales of CFABQ and NRS were 0.210(P〈0.01),0.192(P〈0.05);and CODI were 0.420(P〈0.01),0.351(P〈0.01);and SF-36(physical)were-0.268(P〈0.01),-0.173(P〈0.01);and SF-36(mental)were-0.154(P〉0.05),-0.303(P〈0.01).Conclusion The CFABQ has superior repeatability and validity.It is equivalent to the English FABQ and be used to assess the disabilities in patients with low back pain.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249