检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]水利部松辽委水文局信息中心,吉林长春130021 [2]华北水利水电学院水利学院,河南郑州450011
出 处:《水文》2010年第3期38-42,共5页Journal of China Hydrology
基 金:水利部公益性行业科研项目(200801015);华北水利水电学院高层次人才科研启动项目资助(200821)
摘 要:为了克服传统优化技术在新安江模型参数率定中收敛慢、不稳定等缺点,近年来利用进化算法在水文模型的率定中得到越来越多的重视和发展,但对它们优选效果的比较讨论却非常少见。本文根据三水源新安江模型特点,以洪峰流量,峰现时间和洪水总量为优化目标,采用NSGA-Ⅱ、SPEA、PESA三种经典算法,通过对三种算法产生的非支配集进行算法评价,并比较了三种算法产生非支配集的收敛性与分布性,结果表明NSGA-Ⅱ在总体上最优。Application of traditional methods to calibrate the Xinanjiang model will lead to disadvantages of slow convergence and instability.In order to overcome these disadvantages,the evolutionary algorithms towards the hydrological model calibration have been paid more and more attention,but the comparison of the algorithms is rarely discussed.According to the characteristics of the Xinanjiang model,the peak flow,peak time and flood volume were chosen as three criteria.The NSGA-II,SPEA and PESA were used for calibration and the results proved the effectiveness of the multi-objective evolutionary algorithms.The non-dominated set created by the algorithms was applied to test their performance of convergence and the distribution.The results indicate that the NSGA-II is better than the others.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222