检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:郑鹏程[1]
机构地区:[1]湖南大学法学院
出 处:《法学家》2010年第3期98-105,共8页The Jurist
基 金:国家社科基金资助项目"反垄断立法疑难问题研究"(07BFX042)的阶段性成果之一
摘 要:我国反垄断法的私人实施面临受害人数众多,原告资格难以确认,被告违法行为难以证明,损害赔偿数额难以计算等诸多难题,而竞争文化的缺失,法律工具主义的流行,可能使私人实施反垄断法变得更为困难。将反垄断诉讼之原告限定为直接受违法行为影响的人,以反垄断执法机关或法院作出了被告违法的有效决定或判决作为受理案件的条件,实行因果关系推定原则,统一规定损害赔偿数额的计算方法,重视竞争文化的培育和传播,可有效地克服这些困难。There are many difficulties and obstacles in private enforcement of Chinese Antimonopoly-law. It is difficult to verify exactly plaintiffs among sorts of victims of respondents' restrictive behaviors; complaints can hardly give any evidences that respondents has violated antimonopoly-law,and most of people challenge the justice of private enforcement of public law,etc. In order to make the system of private enforcement operate properly,it is essential to enact a regulation which clarifies the standing to sue and adopts the rule of precondition for damage claims and the rule of causation presumption and clarifies the methods of calculating damages. In addition,the spread of competition culture should also be emphasized.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.31