氨氯地平治疗原发性高血压的疗效观察  被引量:5

Clinical Efficacy Analysis of Amlodipine in the Treatment of Primary Hypertension

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:吴凯[1] 朱立勤[1,2,3] 孙鹤[2] 肖怡然[3] 李敬永[3] 

机构地区:[1]天津市第一中心医院,天津市300192 [2]天津大学药物科学与技术学院,天津市300072 [3]天津医科大学,天津市300070

出  处:《中国药房》2010年第24期2244-2246,共3页China Pharmacy

摘  要:目的:观察氨氯地平治疗原发性高血压的疗效和安全性。方法:选择原发性高血压患者76例,随机分为对照组35例和治疗组41例。对照组使用卡托普利12.5mg,qd;治疗组使用氨氯地平5mg,qd。记录用药治疗期间血压的变化情况,以用药前和用药后第10天血压指标判断疗效。结果:治疗组治疗前、后收缩压值和舒张压值均明显降低,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);治疗组降低收缩压的作用弱于对照组,2组对舒张压的降低作用没有明显差异;对照组显效率为28.57%,总有效率为57.14%,治疗组显效率为75.61%,总有效率为87.80%;治疗组与对照组的显效率和总有效率比较均有显著性差异(P<0.01)。结论:氨氯地平治疗原发性高血压疗效显著,优于卡托普利。OBJECTIVE:To analyze clinical efficacy and safety of amlodipine in the treatment of primary hypertension.METHODS:76 patients with primary hypertension were randomly divided into control group(n=35) and treatment group(n=41).Control group were treated with captopril 12.5 mg once a day and treatment group were given amlodipine 5 mg once a day.The change of blood pressure was recorded during treatment.Blood pressure index at 10th day before and after treatment were used to evaluate clinical efficacy.RESULTS:After treatment systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure were significantly decreased,there was significant difference before and after treatment(P0.01);the decrease of systolic blood pressure in treatment group was smaller than in control group while there had no significant difference.In control group effective rate was 28.57% and total response rate was 57.14%.In treatment group effective rate was 75.61% and total response rate was 87.80%.There were significant difference in effective rate and total response rate between two groups(P0.01).CONCLUSION:Amlodipine is superior to captopril in the treatment of primary hypertension.

关 键 词:氨氯地平 卡托普利 原发性高血压 疗效分析 

分 类 号:R972.4[医药卫生—药品]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象