检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《四川环境》2010年第3期17-19,共3页Sichuan Environment
摘 要:分别用酸煮法和索氏提取法对模拟尘铅样品进行前处理,采用火焰原子吸收光谱法测定,方法线性范围0.08~1.50 mg/L,检出限为0.025 mg/L。对两种前处理效果作了比较,结果表明,采用酸煮法,6次重复测量的相对标准偏差小于2%,加标回收率为90.0%~102%;索氏提取法受装置影响,提取效率不稳定,6次重复测量的相对标准偏差小于11%,加标回收率为81.5%~82.6%,酸煮法的效果优于索氏提取法。Acid digestion and Soxhlet extraction method were adopted respectively to pre-treat the simulated Leaddust samples.Lead content was determined using Flame Atomic Absorption Spectrometry with linear range of 0.08~1.50 mg/L and detection limit of 0.025mg/L.The comparison results showed that the RSD from six duplicate for acid digestion was less than 2% and the spike recovery was 90.0%~102%.While for the Soxhlet-extraction,the extraction efficiency was not stable due the determination was limited by apparatus.The RSD from six duplicate was less than 11% and the spike recovery was 81.5%~82.6%.Therefore the effect of acid digestion was better than Soxhlet extraction.
关 键 词:酸煮法 索氏提取法 火焰原子吸收光谱法 模拟尘铅样品
分 类 号:X831[环境科学与工程—环境工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.118.187.83