检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]南通医学院附属医院骨科
出 处:《南通医学院学报》1999年第1期24-25,共2页ACTA Academiae Medicinae Nantong
摘 要:目的:比较Luque与Stefee两种技术在不稳定型胸腰椎骨折手术中的复位与固定作用。方法:收集本院1989~1992年及1992~1995年间分别采用Luque与Stefee技术治疗胸腰椎不稳定型骨折各34例,对术前、术后1年X片伤椎后突角、椎体移位度及压缩度测量比较。结果:对各种不稳定型胸腰椎骨折治疗,Stefee技术与Luque技术相比在复位与固定方面均表现出明显的优越性。结论:Stefee技术在治疗胸腰椎骨折方面,比Luque技术更理想、可靠,更符合脊柱生物力学要求。Objective:The purpose of this study was to evaluate the difference in clinical outcome with Luque's rod or Steffee plate planted to make reduction and fixation of injured vertebrae.Methods:68 patients with unstable thoracic and lumbar fractures were included.34 of them underwent Luque's method in operation from 1989 to 1992 and another 34 underwent Steffee method from 1992-1995.All patients were followed for at least 1 year and received X-ray imaging before operation and 1 year after operation.We evaluated these results by changing angles of kyphsis,degrees of compression and degrees of displacement of injured vertebrae.Results:As to each type of injury (compression type,bursting type or fracture with dislocation),Steffee method is superior to Luque one,it can achieve much stronger fixation and more reduction,which is 70% on average.Conclusion:Steffee plate is more conformed to the biomechanism of spine,and much better than Luque's rod in treating unstable thoracic or lumbar fractures.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.14.73.0