刑事附带民事案件中限额赔偿原则的提倡——从刑事附带民事执行难说起  

Advocating the Principle of Quota-Based Compensation in Civil Cases Collateral to Criminal Proceedings:Beginning from Enforcement Difficulty in Such Cases

作　　者：袁涌 

机构地区：[1]江苏省徐州市中级人民法院刑-庭

出　　处：《北京政法职业学院学报》2010年第2期48-53,共6页Journal of Beijing College of Politics and Law

摘　　要：刑事附带民事案件执行难,《最高人民法院关于审理人身损害赔偿案件适用法律若干问题的解释》施行以后则更难。照搬适用该司法解释不但造成执行难而且还有许多弊端,如空判现象严重、违背责任自负原则、不利罪犯复归社会等。在刑事附带民事领域应适用限额赔偿原则,辅之以国家补偿制度,多渠道弥补被害人损失,着眼于恢复正义的实现,有效控制社会犯罪总量,以求得国家、社会、被害人、被告人多方利益最大化之结果。刑事附带民事案件执行难,《最高人民法院关于审理人身损害赔偿案件适用法律若干问题的解释》施行以后则更难。照搬适用该司法解释不但造成执行难而且还有许多弊端,如空判现象严重、违背责任自负原则、不利罪犯复归社会等。在刑事附带民事领域应适用限额赔偿原则,辅之以国家补偿制度,多渠道弥补被害人损失,着眼于恢复正义的实现,有效控制社会犯罪总量,以求得国家、社会、被害人、被告人多方利益最大化之结果。Enforcement is difficult when it comes to a civil suit collateral to criminal proceedings and it has become more diff icult since the application of Interpretations of the Supreme People’s Court on Issues Concerning the Hearing of Cases Involving Personal Injury Compensation. Strictly following the Interpretations not only makes the enforcement difficult, but it also brings about many disadvantages, such as the serious phenomenon of making a judgment impossible to be fulf illed, making a judgment against the principle of self-responsibility, being not good for inmates to re-enter society, and so on. We should apply the principle of quota-based compensation to such cases with a state-run compensation system as a complement, so that victims’ damages can be made up for through multi-channels, justice realized and the amount of crime controlled effectively. In that way, the interests of the state, the society, the victim and the accused can be maximized.

关 键 词：刑事附带民事执行难 限额赔偿 社会福利最大化刑事附带民事执行难 社会福利最大化 

分 类 号：D924[政治法律—刑法学]