目的与手段:公共管理中的双重正当性分析  

Ends and Means: An Analysis of the Dual Legitimacy in Public Administration

作　　者：顾凌云[1] 谭安奎[2] 

机构地区：[1]中山大学基建处,广东广州510275 [2]中山大学政治与公共事务管理学院,广东广州510275

出　　处：《北京航空航天大学学报（社会科学版）》2010年第3期1-5,共5页Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics：Social Sciences edition Edition

基　　金：国家社科基金青年项目(08CZX035)

摘　　要：根据"脏手"与国家理性学说,公共管理活动对正当目的的诉求常常意味着要采用不正当的手段。但对目的正当性的片面追求无法避免目的本身被扭曲,从而使得公共管理失去目的与手段的双重正当性,它还可能导致公共管理者与被管理者争抢同一道德制高点的伦理困境。现代公共管理必须追求目的与手段的双重正当性,其理论基础是一种立宪的国家理性,而其实践选择则是行政法治。Viewed from the perspective of the doctrines of ＂dirty hands＂ and the reason of state,it follows from the appeal to the legitimacy of ends in public administration that illegitimate means have to be adopted.The distortion of ends themselves will be unavoidable under the single-minded pursuit of legitimacy of ends, so that the dual legitimacy of ends and means will be out of reach in public administration.Meanwhile,it may also lead to an ethical dilemma in which the public administrators and those administrated scramble for the same moral highland. Modern public administration must seek for the dual legitimacy of ends and means.The theoretical foundation for this is the constitutional reason of state,and the practical choice is the administration by law.

关 键 词：“脏手” 国家理性 公共管理 双重正当性 

分 类 号：D035[政治法律—政治学]