检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《中国学校卫生》2010年第6期679-680,682,共3页Chinese Journal of School Health
基 金:国家985Ⅱ期项目经费(编号:985-027-39)
摘 要:目的探讨父母教养方式对大学生心理复原力的影响,为积极的父母养育方式提供理论依据。方法采用父母教养方式问卷(EMBU)和复原力量表,对新疆某大学492名大学生进行调查。结果父母教养方式各因子中,除父亲偏爱因子及母亲偏爱因子外,其余各因子在不同复原力得分组间差异有统计学意义(P值均<0.01)。父亲惩罚严厉、父亲拒绝否认、母亲拒绝否认、母亲惩罚严厉与复原力量表各维度以及复原力总分呈负相关(P值均<0.01);父亲温暖理解、母亲温暖理解在与复原力总分及复原力量表各维度的相关关系中,除与稳定性无关外,其余均呈正相关(P值均<0.01)。父母教养方式各因子中,母亲惩罚严厉、母亲温暖理解、父亲过度保护可进入回归方程对大学生复原力进行预测,其联合解释量为25.3%。结论大学生所接受的父母教养方式与其复原力之间密切相关,消极的教养方式对于子女复原力发展的影响意义甚于积极性的父母教养方式,母亲的教养方式对于子女复原力的影响大于父亲。Objective To explore the possible influence of parental rearing patterns on resilience of undergraduates,and to provide theoretical evidence for positive parental rearing style.Methods Totally 492 cases of undergraduates were surveyed with Resilience Survey and EMBU.Results There were significant differences between different resilience score groups of undergraduates in almost every factors of EMBU,except the parental favoritism factor(P0.01).The scores of punishment,rejection of parents were significantly negatively correlated with resilience score,while the score of parental warmth was positively correlated with resilience score(P0.01).Multiple stepwise regression analysis revealed maternal punishment and paternal overprotected negatively correlated with resilience score,meanwhile,maternal warmth positively correlated with resilience score.They interpret 25.3% of the resilience score collectively.Conclusion Parental rearing patterns have a close correlation with resilience of undergraduates,and the negative rearing pattern has a much more powerful influence than the positive rearing pattern,while the maternal rearing pattern has a much more powerful influence than the paternal rearing pattern.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.200