检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]杭州师范大学附属医院急诊科,浙江310015
出 处:《中国急救复苏与灾害医学杂志》2010年第6期557-558,共2页China Journal of Emergency Resuscitation and Disaster Medicine
摘 要:目的观察传统青霉素过敏试验皮内注射法与青霉素YLM-2型快速过敏皮试仪皮试法在儿科临床应用中准确性的比较。方法将1100名患儿随机均分成2组,对照组用传统的皮内注射法行青霉素皮试,观察组予YLM-2型快速过敏皮试仪行青霉素皮试,观察其阳性率,输液后反应情况。结果观察组青霉素皮试阳性率为2.91%,显著低于对照组(5.27%,P〈0.05);观察组观察皮试结果需10min,早于对照组(20min)。结论青霉素快速皮试仪准确性高、效果可靠,安全、无痛、省时,假阳性率低等优点。Objective To compare the effects of skin test of penicillin by YLM-2 quick skin tester and by traditional intercutaneous injection. Methods 1 100 pediatric patients to be injected with penicillin were randomly divided into 2 equal groups to undergo skin test of penicillin by YLM-2 quick skin tester and by traditional intercutaneous injection respectively. Results The positive rate of the skin tester group was 2.91%, significantly lower than that of the intracutaneous injection group (5.27%, P〈 0.05). The results could be obtained 10 min after the test in the YLM-2 skin tester group, significantly quicker than in the intracutaneous injection group (20 min). Conclusion Test of penicillin by YLM-2 quick skin tester is safer, quicker, painless, and with lower false positive rate.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15