检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:田蓉蓉[1] 张承刚[1] 齐昊[2] 李险峰[1] 王进[1] 刘建中[1] 李思进[1] 高飞[2] 杨静[2]
机构地区:[1]山西医科大学第一医院核医学科,太原030001 [2]山西医科大学第一医院内分泌科,太原030001
出 处:《中华核医学杂志》2010年第3期185-188,共4页Chinese Journal of Nuclear Medicine
摘 要:目的 用蛋白质负荷肾动态显像评价2型糖尿病(DM)早期肾病患者的肾储备功能(RFR).方法 研究对象共50例:健康对照组(G1组)14例,2型DM正常白蛋白尿组(G2组)15例,2型DM早期肾病组(G3组)21例.1周内分别行静息及蛋白质负荷99Tcm-DTPA肾动态显像.肾储备值为负荷前后肾小球滤过率(GFR)、高峰时间、半排时间、20 min残留率的差值.采用单因素方差分析和t检验,对3组各参数进行比较.结果 GFR所得肾储备值在3组间差异均有统计学意义(t=14.884,32.180,16.042,P均<0.01),蛋白质负荷后,G1组GFR平均增加了20.1ml·min-·1.73 m-2,G2组平均增加了10.9 ml·min-1·1.73 m-2,G3组仅增加了2.2 ml·min-1·1.73 m-2 半排时间所得肾储备值在G2组和G1组间差异有统计学意义(t=5.505,P<0.05),而G3组和G1组间的差异有明显统计学意义(t=8.914,P<0.01) 高峰时间所得肾储备值在G3组和G1组间差异也有统计学意义(t=5.690,P<0.01) 20 min残留率所得肾储备值在G3组和G1组间差异有统计学意义(t=4.376,P<0.05).结论 蛋白质负荷肾动态显像是测定RFR的有效方法,RFR是评价DM早期肾损害的有效指标.Objective To explore a sensitive method and index to evaluate renal functional reserve (RFR) in patients with early diabetic nephropathy (DN) using protein loading-scintirenography.Methods Fifty subjects were studied and divided into 3 groups.Group one (G1) consisted of 14 healthy volunteers Group two (G2) consisted of 15 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) and normoalbuminuria Group three (G3) consisted of 21 patients with type 2 DM and microalbuminuria.All subjects underwent baseline and protein loading-99 Tcm-DTPA scintirenography within one week.RFR was calculated as the difference between stimulated and baseline glomerular filtration rate (GFR), time of peak ( Tb ), time of half excretion ( C1/2 ), residual rate at 20 min ( C20/b ) .Variance analysis and t-test were used to analyze the group differences.Results ( 1 ) The RFR in terms of GFR had statistical difference between any two groups (t=14.884, 32.180, 16.042, all P〈0.01).After protein-loading, the GFR of G1, G2 and G3 increased 20.1, 10.9 and 2.2 ml·min-1·1.73 m-2 respectively.Therefore, the RFR decreased before microalbuminuria in type 2 DM patients.(2)There was statistical difference between the RFR of G1 and G2 in terms of C1/2 (t = 5.505, P〈0.05 ), and between G1 and G3 ( t = 8.914, P〈0.01 ).(3) There was statistical difference of the RFR in terms of TP between G1 and G3 (t = 5.690, P 〈 0.01 ).(4) There was statistical difference of the RFR in terms of C20/b between G1 and G3 (t= 4.376, P〈0.05 ).Conclusions 99Tcm-DTPA protein loading-scintirenography is an effective method for measuring RFR to evaluate early DN in type 2 DM patients.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.4