药品专利保护的博弈分析——兼论“公地悲剧”与“反公地悲剧”研究现状  

Game analysis of patent protection of pharmaceutical products:a review of researches on tragedy of the commons and tragedy of the anticommons

作　　者：姚颉靖[1] 彭辉[1] 

机构地区：[1]同济大学知识产权学院,上海200092

出　　处：《武汉科技大学学报（社会科学版）》2010年第3期65-69,共5页Journal of Wuhan University of Science and Technology:Social Science Edition

基　　金：上海市社科规划青年课题项目(编号:2006EZH002);国家建设高水平大学公派研究生项目(编号:2007102344)

摘　　要：加强药品专利保护才能避免"公地悲剧"、促进医药产业的发展,但目前医药产业"专利丛林"现象,极易造成专利成果利用不足和上游基础研究被闲置的"反公地悲剧",为此学界在理论研究和实证分析中形成了"药品专利消极主义"和"药品专利积极主义"两种不同观点,笔者通过深入剖析指出,"药品专利消极主义"更具有可信度。To strengthen patent protection of pharmaceutical products can avoid the tragedy of the commons and promote the development of pharmaceutical industry;however,patent thicket in pharmaceutical industry tend to result in the tragedy of the anticommons,that is,the underuse of the patent innovation and the impossibility of using upstream basic research.There are two different views formed in the process of theoretical and empirical analysis on the two tragedies,namely pro-drug patent and anti-drug patent.This article suggests that anti-drug patent is more credible.

关 键 词：药品专利保护 公地悲剧 反公地悲剧 

分 类 号：D923.4[政治法律—民商法学]