跟腱断裂术后康复体位改良的对比研究  

Comparison study on modified rehabilitation body position for patients with Achilles tendon rupture after operation

作　　者：邵松玲[1] 阵庠仑[1] 何琼芳[1] 谭永花[1] 丘宇辉[1] 

机构地区：[1]广东医学院附属深圳市福田区人民医院

出　　处：《护理研究（下旬版）》2010年第6期1633-1634,共2页Chinese Nursing Researsh

摘　　要：[目的]比较跟腱断裂术后病人分别采用休息位有限制动法与传统的踝关节重力垂足位石膏制动法治疗踝关节功能恢复情况的效果,改进跟腱断裂术后康复体位,减少并发症,促进患肢早日康复。[方法]将56例跟腱断裂术后病人随机分为观察组和对照组,观察组术后踝关节采取休息位有限制动。对照组采取传统的踝关节重力垂足位石膏制动。一年后采用AmerLindhoin疗效评定标准对两组病人踝关节功能恢复情况进行比较。[结果]观察组踝关节功能恢复优良率占92.5%,而对照组关节功能恢复优良率占为74.1%,有显著性差异。[结论]跟腱断裂术后康复体位采用改良休息位结合早期功能锻炼,踝关节功能恢复情况明显优于传统体位康复效果。Objective： To compare the recovery effect of Achilles tendon rupture patients accepting rest position limited immobilization method and traditional ankle joint gravity footdrop position plaster immobilization method respectively, to improve postoperative rehabilitation position of Achilles tendon rupture, to reduce complications and to promote early recovery of affected limbs of patients. Methods： A total of 56 patients with rupture of Achilles tendon accepted operation were randomly divided into test group and control group. Patients of test group had taken a rest position limited immobilization after ankle jiont operation. Patients of control group were given traditional ankle joint gravity footdrop position plaster immobilization. Then the status quo of ankle joint recovery of two group patients were compared by adopting Amer-Lindhoin therapeutic effect evaluation standard a year later. Results.The fineness rate of ankle joint function recovery in test group accounted for 92.5%. And the fineness rate of ankle joint function recovery in control group accounted for 74.1%. There was statistical significant difference between them. Conclusion. Combined modified rest body position as postoperative rehabilitation and early functional exercise for Achilles tendon rupture patients, the function recovery of ankle joint significantly was superior to the traditional position rehabilitation effect.

关 键 词：跟腱断裂 康复体位 功能锻炼 

分 类 号：R473.6[医药卫生—护理学]