检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘艳秋[1] 孙安修[1] 蔡萍[1] 戴燕鸣[1] 黄富宏[1]
机构地区:[1]江苏省扬州市第一人民医院,江苏扬州225001
出 处:《中国药业》2010年第12期57-58,共2页China Pharmaceuticals
摘 要:目的了解医院开展处方评价与分析专项活动前后门急诊处方的规范性和合理用药情况。方法随机抽取我院2009年1月至6月门急诊处方21324张、7月至12月门急诊处方25162张,根据2007年卫生部《处方管理办法》和有关文献对处方书写规范性和用药合理性进行评价。结果处方评价与分析专项活动前不规范处方9462张(44.37%),用药不合理处方2416张(11.33%);专项活动后不规范处方2275张(9.04%),用药不合理处方1536张(6.10%)。结论开展处方评价与分析专项活动在一定程度上提高了医院门急诊处方质量,但仍存在一定程度的书写不规范现象及不合理用药情况,需引起重视。Objective To comprehend the standardability of outpatient emergency prescriptions and the status of rational drug use before and after the campaign about the evaluations and analysis of outpatient emergency prescriptions in our hospital.Methods To randomly select 21 324 pieces of outpatient emergency prescriptions from January to June in 2009 and 25 162 pieces of outpatient emergency prescriptions from July to December in 2009.Based on the Administrative Rules on Prescription promulgated by the Ministry of Health in 2007 and other related documents,we evaluated the writing normality and rational use of drugs in these prescriptions.Then the gathered statistic data were analyzed and evaluated for making suggestions.Results Before the campaign,there were 9 462 pieces(44.37%) of non standard prescriptions and 2 416 pieces(11.33%) of irrational use of drugs.After the campaign,there were 2 275 pieces(9.04%) of non standard prescriptions and 1 536 pieces(6.10%) of irrational use of drugs.Conclusion The campaign about the evaluations and analysis of prescriptions improves the quality of outpatient emergency prescriptions to some extend.But there still exist the problems of non-standard prescriptions and irrational use of drugs,which should be paid more attention to.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.31