检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:薛有地[1] 任永信[1] 张宁[1] 殷国勇[1] 金正帅[1] 胡志毅[1] 蔡卫华[1] 余利鹏[1]
机构地区:[1]南京医科大学第一附属医院骨科,江苏南京210029
出 处:《南京医科大学学报(自然科学版)》2010年第7期1009-1012,共4页Journal of Nanjing Medical University(Natural Sciences)
基 金:国家自然科学基金面上项目(30901528);江苏省卫生厅面上项目(H200871)资助
摘 要:目的:探讨同种异体骨移植在胸腰椎爆裂性骨折后路融合术中的使用效果。方法:对33例胸腰椎爆裂性骨折患者行同种异体骨或自体骨移植后路融合术,男21例,女12例,随机分为单纯使用同种异体骨移植组(16例)和采用自体髂骨移植(17例)。术后对两组患者的平均手术时间、出血量和并发症进行对比分析,术后24周时比较两组患者的融合率,采用Oswestry评分对两组患者进行功能评价。结果:与自体骨移植组相比,同种异体骨移植组手术时间明显缩短,失血量也明显减少。术后24周两组融合率均达到100%,Oswestry评分均无显著性差异。结论:在胸腰椎爆裂性骨折后路融合术中,同种异体骨移植可以取得满意的临床效果。Objective:To investigate the efficacy of allograft bone in posterior spinal fusion in thoracolumbar fracture.Methods:33 patients with thoracolumbar fracture,who underwent posterior spinal instrumentation and fusion using allograft or autograft bone,were evaluated prospectively.All of the patients were randomized into group A(16 cases using only allograft bone)and group B(17 cases using only autograft iliac bone).The mean operative duration,average blood loss and complications between the two groups were analyzed comparatively.Fusion rate and Oswestry score at 24 weeks after surgery of the 2 groups were calculated respectively.Results:Group A was better than group B by a shorter operative duration,less blood loss.Fusion rate at 24 weeks after surgery of the two groups was 100%.There was no significant difference of Oswestry score at 24 weeks after surgery between the 2 groups.Conclusion:A satisfactory outcome can be achieved in posterior spinal fusion in thoracolumbar fracture using allograft bone.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.145.180.18