两种图书分类体系共存的弊端与对策研究  

Problems and Solutions to the Library Classification Management

作　　者：刘念[1] 

机构地区：[1]西安建筑科技大学,陕西西安710055

出　　处：《西安建筑科技大学学报（社会科学版）》2010年第2期97-100,共4页Journal of Xi'an University of Architecture & Technology(Social Science Edition)

摘　　要：目前,许多高校图书馆都存在《中图法》、《科图法》并存使用的情况,这样的状况已经严重地阻碍着图书馆的读者服务工作质量的提高,并且对图书馆的工作带来了不少困难。《中图法》具有先进性、权威性、广泛性等优点,建议高校图书馆首先可选择《中图法》作为分类系统。其他图书馆从各自的实际出发,采用因地制宜的步骤,实现分类方法的统一,克服图书管理混乱的局面。Currently, most libraries employ both Chinese Library Classification （CLC） and Classification for the Chinese Academy of Science Library （Classification for CAS Library） time. The resulting problems have seriously obstructed the improvement of readers at the same service and brought difficulties to the library management. Since Chinese Library Classification has such attrib utes as ad the classif vancement, author ication system, or ity ad and pervasiveness, it is necessary for university libraries to take it as opt an appropriate one to solve the problems resulting from the management chaos.

关 键 词：图书馆 图书分类 中图法 

分 类 号：G253[文化科学—图书馆学]