检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]河南省开封市第二人民医院,河南开封475002
出 处:《中医正骨》2010年第6期12-13,16,共3页The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology
摘 要:目的:比较经皮腰椎间盘摘除术和经皮激光腰椎间盘汽化减压术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的疗效和安全性。方法:将66例腰椎间盘突出症病人随机分为2组,每组33例,在X线监视下分别采用经皮腰椎间盘摘除术和经皮激光腰椎间盘汽化减压术治疗,观察对比两组的临床疗效及术后并发症。结果:术后6个月,两组疗效结果比较,差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.112 3,P=0.737 6)。两组均无严重并发症发生。结论:X线导向下行经皮腰椎间盘摘除术和经皮激光腰椎间盘汽化减压术介入治疗腰椎间盘突出症安全、有效。Objective:To compare the curative effects and safety of percutaneous lumbar diskectomy(PLD)with those of percutaneous laser disc decompression(PLDD)on the treatment of lumbar disc herniation(LDH).Methods:66 LDH patients were randomly divided into 2 groups,33 cases in each group.Under X-ray monitoring,the patients were treated by PLD and PLDD respectively.The clinical curative effects and postoperative complications were observed.Results:6 months after the surgery,there was no statistical difference in the curative effects between the 2 groups(χ2=0.112 3,P=0.737 6).No serious complications occurred in both groups.Conclusions:It is safe and effective for the method of X-ray oriented PLD and PLDD to treat LDH.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.244