民初法律冲突中大理院的解释逻辑——以婚姻个案为基础的考察  

Supreme Court's Logic Interpretation of Legal Conflicts in Early Republic of China:The Research on Marrige Case

作　　者：曾青未[1] 

机构地区：[1]云南大学法学院,云南昆明650091

出　　处：《云南农业大学学报（社会科学版）》2010年第3期60-63,共4页Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University(Social Science)

摘　　要：民初大理院因法律解释之责首当其冲地面对社会生活中发生的法律冲突。大理院进行法律解释的个案表明:虽然大理院希望接引西方法理改进中国旧法,但实际上它并没有简单地将西法引入,而是努力将西法与中国的旧法以及社会事实进行沟通。大理院的处理立场与解释逻辑颇值得玩味。The legal interpretation duty of supreme court first of all lies in the legal conflicts during social lives. The fact that supreme court adopting legal interpretation demonstrates that： although supreme court wishes to use western jurisprudence to change the outdated Chinese law, this is not a simple adoption of the western law, but is an attempt to associate western law with the outdated Chinese law and social phenomena. The attitude and logic adopted by supreme court is very intriguing.

关 键 词：法律冲突 大理院 解释 婚姻 民初 

分 类 号：D92[政治法律—法学]