检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:湛茜[1]
机构地区:[1]复旦大学法学院,上海200438
出 处:《世界贸易组织动态与研究(上海对外贸易学院学报)》2010年第4期34-39,45,共7页Journal of Shanghai University of International Business and Economics
摘 要:专家审议在WTO争端解决机制中起着日益重要的作用,依据WTO《争端解决谅解》(DSU)第13条第2款规定,专家组对于争端方所提科学或其他技术事项的事实性问题可请求专家审议小组提供书面咨询。随着WTO解决的争端的技术性和复杂性的日益增加,专家组越来越多地征询专家意见。本文旨在对WTO争端解决中的专家审议机制进行较为全面的分析,并对其专家的选任和专家意见征求程序方面的改进提出一点构想。Expert review groups play a crucial role in the WTO dispute settlement system. According to Art.13.2 of the Dispute Settlement Understanding, each panel shall have the right to seek information and technical advice from any individual or body which it deems appropriate. With the increasing technicality and complexity of the disputes, the expert review is playing a more and more signifi cant role in the WTO dispute settlement. Based on Appendix 4 of the DSU, this article focuses on the current expert review mechanism and puts forward some thoughtful suggestions on the perfection of expert selection and the solicitation of expert advice in the WTO dispute settlement system.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.148.239.85